OBJECTIVE
|
The Analysis Centers (ACs) of the
International GNSS Service
are in the process of reanalyzing the full history of GPS data collected
by the IGS global network since 1994 in a fully consistent way using the
latest models and methodology. This is the first such full reprocessing
by the IGS, but it is expected to be repeated in the future as further
analysis changes are made.
|
SUMMARY
OF
PRODUCTS
|
The expected Analysis Center and combined IGS products include:
daily GPS orbits & satellite clocks
- 15-minute intervals (SP3c format)
- satellite clocks in IGS timescale (loosely aligned to GPS time)
daily satellite & tracking station clocks
- 5-minute intervals (clock RINEX format)
- in IGS timescale (loosely aligned to GPS time)
daily Earth rotation parameters (ERPs)
- from SINEX & classic orbit combinations (IGS erp format)
- x & y coordinates of pole
- rate-of-change of x & y pole coordinates
- excess length-of-day (LOD)
weekly terrestrial coordinate frames with ERPs
- with full variance-covariance matrix (SINEX format)
possible other products ?
- ionosphere maps, tropospheric zenith path delays, etc
- not part of this first campaign
|
ANALYSIS
CENTERS
|
The participating Analysis Centers contributing complete solutions to
this effort are:
CODE —
Center for Orbit Determination in Europe, Switzerland
EMR —
Natural Resources Canada, Canada
ESA —
European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), ESA, Germany
GFZ —
GeoForschungsZentrum/Potsdam, Germany
JPL —
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA
MIT —
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
NGS —
National Geodetic Survey, NOAA, USA
PDR —
GeoForschungsZentrum/Potsdam & Technical University of Dresden, Germany
SIO —
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, USA
In addition, some centers provide weekly SINEX solutions to help
densify the terrestrial reference frame, particularly for GPS stations
located near tide gauges (associated with the
TIGA Pilot
Project); work is underway to perhaps include associated satellite
orbits and clocks:
GTZ —
GFZ TIGA, Germany
ULR —
University of La Rochelle, France
Summaries of the analysis strategies and procedures for each AC are posted
at the IGS Central
Bureau. Submitted AC solution files are posted at this
GFZ site.
The product combination centers are:
NRCan —
Natural Resources Canada, Canada
- SINEX
combination — as of mid-Feb. 2009, results posted for
years 2000-2008 (see below)
NCL —
University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
GFZ —
GeoForschungsZentrum/Potsdam, Germany
NRL —
Naval Research Laborartory, USA
- clock
& timescale combination results not yet available
|
FEATURES
OF DATA
ANALYSES
|
Essential elements of the analysis procedures used by all participating
centers include:
try to complete archives for missing or useful
data sets
- focus on as many tide gauge stations as possible
- also try to include NGA/NIMA tracking stations
- try to include all GPS stations co-located with other techniques
use "absolute" antenna calibrations for
satellite transmit & ground receive antennas
use IGS05 reference frame (aligned to ITRF2005)
IERS Conventions 2003 generally implemented
- with occasional updates
posted by the IERS Conventions Center
updated model for station displacements due to ocean tidal loading
no non-tidal loading displacements should be applied to station positions
updated models for tropospheric propagation delays
- refer to revised IERS Conventions
Chapter 9
- a priori meteorological data sources:
[1] local sensor met files (which however are only available for a few sites), or
[2] barometric pressure values computed using the location- & season-dependent
GPT model, or
[3] retrieved from a numerical weather model, as for the ECMWF global values provided by the
service at the Technical University of Vienna in the form of
gridded hydrostatic zenith delays
(see below)
- the a priori hydrostatic delay in the zenith direction should be computed
from the surface pressure according to the formula of Saastamoinen (1972) as given
by Davis et al. (1985) and shown as
eqn (11) in the revised IERS
Conventions Chapter 9
— or retrieved directly in this form based on a numerical weather model, as for the gridded
ECMWF values provided by the
service at the Technical University of Vienna
— or alternatively one can use an a priori zenith delay consisting of both the
hydrostatic and wet components (using surface temperature values from GPT and a standard
relative humidity of about 0.5) to ensure tropospheric parameter adjustments that are more
nearly zero-mean
- line of sight delays should be computed using either:
- residual tropospheric delays should be parameterized in the GPS data
analysis on the assumption that they are predominantly due to the wet component of the troposphere
(wet mapping function partials) & azimuthal gradients, as described in
IERS Conventions Chapter 9
no common model for higher-order ionospheric corrections has been agreed yet
the IGS master SINEX template file,
igs.snx, is updated
daily based on the history of IGS site logs & should be used to validate AC SINEX
file metadata
P1-C1 satellite code biases
|
TEST
RESULTS
|
To evaluate analysis and combination procedures, the ACs have provided
test solutions for the first quarter of year 2000. Results from those
tests are posted
here.
|
ISSUES
TO BE
RESOLVED
|
There are several remaining issues to be addressed:
all ACs need to maintain updated
analysis summaries, including operational & reprocessing ACs
- SIO last updated 31 Oct. 2005
verify that all necessary IGS metadata files
are current & complete
|
FILENAMING
AND
ARCHIVING
|
The following filenaming and archiving conventions have been adopted for this
first and future reprocessing campaigns:
IGS reprocessing campaign numbering
- Since over the coming years we
expect that there will be successive reprocessings, we will
declare that each has a 1-character number to designate it.
The present campaign will be "1". It will run from now till at
least the end of 2009, probably.
- Do we really need to think about
more than 9 reprocessings now? That will be for a period of probably
about 20 years. Many other things will likely change over that time.
AC & combination file deposits
- ACs should deposit standard Finals-like
reprocessed solution files to the CDDIS Global Data Center (only) in
their normal file
delivery areas but under new subdirectories
.../repro .
- The AC and combination filenames must
indicate the reprocessing campaign sequence number by
using names of the type:
CC#WWWWD.typ.Z
where the standard center code "CCC" is changed to "CC#" and "#" is
the particular reprocessing sequence number.
- Those AC files are automatically moved
to the standard public product archive directories but in new
subdirectories
/gps/products/WWWW/repro#
where # is the particular reprocessing sequence number. During the
reprocessing, the combination products will also be put in these
subdirectories.
- As with standard operational files,
if an AC or combination center resubmits a newer version of any
reprocessed solution file it will overwrite any older version.
move to operational status
- When the current 1st
reprocessing campaign reaches its conclusion and the results are
certified to be of a quality at least as good as the original
operational solutions, then the present operational files will be
moved downward to
/gps/products/WWWW/orig
subdirectories for permanent archiving.
- At the same time, the 1st
reprocessed files will be symbolically linked from
/gps/products/WWWW/repro1/CC1WWWWD.typ.Z
back up to the standard product directories to become the new
operational products using the current standard IGS product names,
from the earliest reprocessed week through 1459:
/gps/products/WWWW/repro1/CC1WWWWD.typ.Z
-> /gps/products/WWWW/CCCWWWWD.typ.Z
- The present operational product files
for weeks 1460 onward will remain in place and should be consistent
with the 1st reprocessing products for weeks 1459 and
earlier. (In fact, the original operational AC solutions during
2008 -- weeks 1460 through 1512 -- will also be recombined at
the SINEX level to ensure stricter
consistency in the handling of time series discontinuities and some
other details. These recombinations are posted in repro1
subdirectories too, and will be moved to the operational directories
at the end of the campaign. However, there will be no other
recombined products nor new AC solutions.)
- In this way, users should always be
able to access the latest, most consistent set of IGS products by
always downloading files from the standard product directories
using the standard names.
- On the other hand, users must take
care to check for processing consistency when mixing recently
downloaded files with older files. README and other advisory
information will be posted and distributed to caution users on
this point.
future reprocessings
- The same approach will be used
with any future reprocessing campaigns, by creating sequentially new
/gps/products/WWWW/repro#
product directories, etc.
|
SCHEDULE
|
The following schedule is suggested:
Feb. 2008 — begin full
reprocessing phase
- start with data for week 1459 (23-29 Dec 2007)
- then work backwards in time, hopefully back to 1994.0
- the operational Final products from
week 1460 forward should be consistent with the reprocessing so that
the continuous span from 1994 onward will eventually become the
official IGS product set
02-06 June 2008 — IGS workshop
- evaluate progress for initial phase of reprocessing
January 2009 — prepare IGS submission for ITRF2008
- all available solutions (with sufficient
AC redundancy) submitted on a sliding schedule up January 2009 will
be used to form
a preliminary time series of weekly repro1 SINEX combinations:
- earlier — years 2007-2005 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 14 Nov. 2008 — year 2004 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 28 Nov. 2008 — year 2003 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 12 Dec. 2008 — year 2002 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 26 Dec. 2008 — year 2001 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 09 Jan. 2009 — year 2000 to be submitted to CDDIS
- the preliminary repro1 time series
will then be submitted to the IERS ITRF Product Center to be
included in the ITRF2008 multi-technique combination
- it was originally expected that the
IGS time series would cover at least the period 2000 - 2008 (inclusive)
- this period was extended in May (see
below) to cover the additional years 1997 - 1999 (inclusive),
which were submitted by late July
10 February 2009 —
submission deadline for ITRF2008 input solutions
- all technique combined solutions due
to ITRF Product Center of the IERS
- first preliminary ITRF2008 results &
discussions at EGU General Assembly, 19-24 April 2009 in Vienna
- final ITRF2008 solution to be released
15 July 2009
May - July 2009 — extend IGS submission
for ITRF2008
IGS solution for ITRF2008 —
some assessment results are given below
later 2009 — finish repro1 products
- form full set of repro1 orbit & SINEX
combination products using all available AC solutions during
period 1994 - 2007
- repro1 products will be merged with
standard operational IGS Final products for period since week 1460
(since 30 December 2007) for complete coverage from 1994 to
present
- schedule for completion of
repro1 reanalysis work by ACs (as of 22 Jul 2009):
- 14 Aug 2009 — year 2007 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 21 Aug 2009 — year 2006 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 28 Aug 2009 — year 2005 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 04 Sep 2009 — year 2004 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 11 Sep 2009 — year 2003 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 18 Sep 2009 — year 2002 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 25 Sep 2009 — year 2001 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 02 Oct 2009 — year 2000 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 09 Oct 2009 — year 1999 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 16 Oct 2009 — year 1998 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 23 Oct 2009 — year 1997 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 30 Oct 2009 — year 1996 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 06 Nov 2009 — year 1995 to be submitted to CDDIS
- 13 Nov 2009 — year 1994 to be submitted to CDDIS
- final cutoff dates for any
replacement AC solutions (updated 12 November 2009):
- 16 Nov 2009 — last
submissions for years 2001-2007 at CDDIS
- 23 Nov 2009 — last
submissions for years 1997-1999 at CDDIS
- 30 Nov 2009 — last
submissions for years 1994-1996 at CDDIS
- it remains to be seen if enough
usable solutions will be available for 1994
- final weekly SINEX combinations
are expected by the end of Dec 2009
|
ITRF2008
SUBMISSION
|
IGS solution for ITRF2008 — combined
solution files submitted to IERS ITRF Product Center
Consistency
of the IGS contribution to ITRF2008 (2009)
-
presentation by Rémi Ferland at the European
Geosciences Union 2009 General Assembly
Reprocessed polar motion results from
the ITRF2008 combination
- analysis of IGS GPS-only polar
motion results submitted for ITRF2008, illustrating the time
evolution of the quality of the IGS polar motion time series
over the 12.5 year period from 1997.0 through 2009.5
Quality assessment of
the ITRF2008 (2009)
-
presentation by Z. Altamimi, X. Collilieux, and L. Métivier at
the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting
ITRF2008 station
position residual time series
-
station position residuals from long-term linear stackings of solutions
from each contributing technique, including IGS
-
note: the adjustment of weekly Helmert alignment parameters to
form the long-term frames has probably absorbed some portion of the
non-linear variations of individual stations (e.g., due to
time-varying surface loading), especially from the vertical component
|
CURRENT
PROCESSING
STATUS
|
year 2000 test period
The status of test reprocessing, effective 06 May 2008:
File type codes:
x - snx sinex
e - erp earth rotation parameters
o - sp3 orbits (eph)
c - clk clocks
s - sum summary
---------------------------------------------------------
WEEK yyyy ddd es1 gf1 mi1 ng1 pd1 si1
xeocs xeocs xeocs xeocs xeocs xeocs
---------------------------------------------------------
1042 1999-360 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1043 2000-002 1177_ _1771 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1044 2000-009 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1045 2000-016 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1046 2000-023 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1047 2000-030 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1048 2000-037 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1049 2000-044 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1050 2000-051 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1051 2000-058 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1052 2000-065 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1053 2000-072 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1054 2000-079 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1055 2000-086 1177_ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1056 2000-093 _____ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1057 2000-100 _____ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1058 2000-107 _____ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1059 2000-114 _____ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1060 2000-121 _____ _____ 11771 117_1 117__ 117_1
1061 2000-128 _____ _____ 11771 _____ _____ _____
---------------------------------------------------------
Test campaign status summary (year 2000; weeks 1042 to 1060):
es1 : 2007-11-07 (no files at CDDIS; posted directly to GFZ)
mi1 : 2008-05-01
ng1 : 2008-01-02 (no files at CDDIS; posted directly to GFZ)
pd1 : 2007-07-16 (no files at CDDIS; posted directly to GFZ)
si1 : 2007-06-23 (no files at CDDIS; posted directly to GFZ)
status for operational years 2007 and earlier
The status of repro1 reprocessing, effective 03 December 2009:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
AC 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
AC submissions:
CO1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE
EM1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ----
ES1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ----
GF1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE
GT1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ---- ---- ---- ----
JP1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ---- ----
MI1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ---- ---- ---- ----
NG1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ----
PD1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE
SI1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE
UL1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE ---- ----
SINEX combinations:
IG1 DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE DONE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plots of the statistical results from those weeks that have been reprocessed
so far can be found at this
website
maintained at NRCanada by Rémi Ferland.
|
RESULTS
AND
ASSESSMENTS
|
Repro1 preliminary product combinations for evaluation:
SINEX
TRF & ERP preliminary combination results
ftp
directories for preliminary weekly orbit combination summary
reports
-
provided by GeoForschungsZentrum/Potsdam (GFZ), Germany
Repro1 final product combinations:
SINEX
TRF & ERP final combination results
Availability
of reprocessed products
ITRF2008 station
position residual time series
-
station position residuals from long-term linear stackings of solutions
from each contributing technique, including IGS
-
note: the adjustment of weekly Helmert alignment parameters to
form the long-term frames has probably absorbed some portion of the
non-linear variations of individual stations (e.g., due to
time-varying surface loading), especially from the vertical component
Assessments & use of repro1 products:
Quality assessment of
the ITRF2008 (2009)
-
presentation by Z. Altamimi, X. Collilieux, and L. Métivier at
the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting
Quality assessment of
GPS reprocessed terrestrial reference frame (2009)
-
presentation by X. Collilieux, Z. Altamimi, L. Métivier, and
T. van Dam at
the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting (ppt)
Reprocessed polar motion results from
the ITRF2008 combination
- analysis of IGS GPS-only polar
motion results submitted for ITRF2008, illustrating the time
evolution of the quality of the IGS polar motion time series
over the 12.5 year period from 1997.0 through 2009.5
Reprocessed polar motion assessments
— for period 2005 - 2007
-
results shown are for the latest AC solutions, which may not be the
same as some earlier solutions used for the ITRF2008 submission;
also not all ACs had solutions available at the time of ITRF2008
submission; all AC solutions will be used in the final repro1
combination
Validating Earth orientation
series with models of atmospheric & oceanic angular momenta (2009)
-
presentation by R. Gross at the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union
Meeting
ITRF2008 ERP comparisons
with IGS repro1 (25 March 2010)
-
comparison by Z. Altamimi of preliminary ITRF2008 combinations by
IGN & DGFI with IGS repro1 (IG1) series
ITRF2008 & IGS repro1 polar motion comparisons
with AAM+OAM (28 March 2010)
-
comparison by J. Kouba of preliminary ITRF2008 combination results
for polar motion by IGN & DGFI as well as by IGS repro1 (IG1) with
AAM+OAM excitation
Preliminary reprocessed orbit
assessments
— for period 2005 - 2007
-
results shown are for preliminary AC solutions, which may not be the
same as some earlier solutions used for the ITRF2008 submission or
final solutions submitted later;
also not all ACs had solutions available at the time of ITRF2008
submission; all AC solutions will be used in the final repro1
combination
Reprocessed orbit assessments
— for 3 equal periods from Aug. 1999 - Dec. 2007
-
results shown are for the latest AC solutions, which may not be the
same as some earlier solutions, and the final IG1 combination; the
analysis of day-boundary discontinuities considers conventional
XYZ 1D magnitudes, as well as along, cross, and radial components
Preliminary
analysis of IGS reprocessed orbit and polar motion estimates
(2009)
-
presentation by J. Ray and J. Griffiths at the European
Geosciences Union 2009 General Assembly
Assessment of
the orbits from the 1st IGS reprocessing campaign (2009)
-
presentation by J. Griffiths, G. Gendt, Th. Nischan, and J. Ray at
the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting
Multi-technique
reprocessing and combination using "space-ties" (2009)
-
presentation by T. Springer, F. Dilssner, D. Escobar, M.Otten,
I. Romero, and J. Dow at
the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting
Quality of
GRACE orbits using the reprocessed IGS products (2009)
-
presentation by Z. Kang, B. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, and H. Save
at the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting
Assessment of
3D hydrologic deformation using GRACE and GPS (2009)
-
presentation by C. Watson, P. Tregoning, K. Fleming, R. Burgette,
W. Featherstone, J. Awange, M. Kuhn, and G. Ramillien at
the Fall 2009 American Geophysical Union Meeting
(ppt)
Results from
the new IGS time scale algorithm (2009)
-
poster presentation by K. Senior and J. Ray at the Fall 2009
American Geophysical Union Meeting
(ppt)
Results
from the new IGS time scale algorithm (2010)
-
poster presentation by K. Senior and J. Ray IGS 2010 Workshop,
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 28 June 2010 (ppt)
External
comparison of EOP results (2010)
-
presentation by R.S. Gross at IGS 2010 Workshop,
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 30 June 2010
IGS
reprocessing -- Summary of orbit/clock combination and first quality
assessment (2010)
-
presentation by G. Gendt, J. Griffiths, Th. Nischan, and J. Ray
at IGS 2010 Workshop, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 30 June 2010
ITRF2008 and
the IGS contribution (2010)
-
presentation by Z. Altamimi at IGS 2010 Workshop,
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 28 June 2010
Status
of IGS core products (2010)
-
presentation by J. Ray and J. Griffiths at IGS 2010 Workshop,
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 28 June 2010
|
FUTURE
PLANS
|
Interactions of the
IGS reprocessing and the IGS antenna phase center model (2009)
-
presentation by R. Schmid, P. Steigenberger, U. Hugentobler, R. Dach,
M. Schmitz, and Florian Dilssner at the Fall 2009 American Geophysical
Union Meeting
Preparations
for the 2nd IGS Reprocessing Campaign (2009)
-
poster presentation by J. Ray at the Fall 2009 American Geophysical
Union Meeting
|